| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.1 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
810f10
Core
Gemini Lake
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2018

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2626 (56.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
7841 (48.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
3626 (31.91%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
2928 (-14.96%)
TOTAL
13165
17021 (29.29%)

Multithread

J4105

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
5767 (-9.78%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
24153 (20.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
9277 (-9.25%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2829 (-42.74%)
TOTAL
41572
42025 (1.09%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
11671 (138.39%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
14019 (93.23%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
4526 (64.33%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2927 (-11.76%)
TOTAL
18223
33144 (81.88%)

Multithread

J4105

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
20487 (8.73%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
31317 (14.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
9991 (-3.50%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
3030 (-37.57%)
TOTAL
61495
64825 (5.42%)

Performance/W
J4105
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8