| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
100fa0
Core
Gemini Lake
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2017
May 2010

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1981 (17.72%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
4569 (-13.62%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2572 (-6.43%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3514 (2.06%)
TOTAL
13165
12636 (-4.01%)

Multithread

J4105

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
11863 (85.60%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
27404 (36.90%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
15390 (50.56%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
3456 (-30.05%)
TOTAL
41572
58113 (39.79%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
5170 (5.61%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5326 (-26.59%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2759 (0.15%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3513 (5.90%)
TOTAL
18223
16769 (-7.98%)

Multithread

J4105

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
29823 (58.27%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
30789 (12.18%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
15882 (53.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
3691 (-23.93%)
TOTAL
61495
80186 (30.39%)

Performance/W
J4105
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8