| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs A6 9210


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.4 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
670f00
Core
Gemini Lake
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
Jun 2016

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
4871 (-0.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
10380 (43.06%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2589 (-6.01%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2383 (-28.16%)
TOTAL
18223
20223 (10.97%)

Multithread

J4105

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
7407 (-60.69%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
11873 (-56.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
3351 (-67.63%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2602 (-46.38%)
TOTAL
61495
25233 (-58.97%)

Performance/W
J4105
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1682 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8