Celeron J4105 vs A6 3500
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 3500 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.9 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.9 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
300f10
Core
Gemini Lake
Llano
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
4/4
3/3
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3x1024 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
32.72k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
4.75k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
4.72k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.49k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
1.69k (x0.51)
TOTAL
18.22k
13.65k (x0.75)
Multithread
J4105
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
12.56k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
12.58k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
6.08k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
1.49k (x0.31)
TOTAL
61.49k
32.72k (x0.53)
Performance/W
J4105
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
503 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4