| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-1235U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-1235U gets 288.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 4.7 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
906a4
Core
Gemini Lake
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
10/12
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
7.33k (x4.36)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
18.27k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
12.8k (x4.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
13.2k (x3.83)
TOTAL
13.16k
51.61k (x3.92)

Multithread

J4105

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
29.24k (x4.58)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
83.32k (x4.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
54.53k (x5.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
4.99k (x1.01)
TOTAL
41.57k
172.07k (x4.14)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
23.53k (x4.81)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
23.51k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
14.71k (x5.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
13.24k (x3.99)
TOTAL
18.22k
74.99k (x4.12)

Multithread

J4105

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
106.07k (x5.63)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
115.88k (x4.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
60.53k (x5.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
5.88k (x1.21)
TOTAL
61.49k
288.36k (x4.69)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
7072 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
7725 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
4035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
392 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
19224 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
5347 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
5344 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
3344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
3009 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
17044 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4