| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Pentium 4 519K


Description
Both models 347 and 519K are based on NetBurst architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the 519K gets 0 k points.

Summarizing, the 519K is NAN times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
f41
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Prescott
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
3.06 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/1
1/1
TDP
86 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
16+16 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
1024 kB
Date
September 2006
January 2005

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
519K
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1591 (1.79%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
2838 (-6.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1382 (1.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
762 (1.43%)
TOTAL
6710
6572 (-2.05%)

Multithread

347

519K
Test#1 (Integers)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
0 (nan%)
TOTAL
0
0 (nan%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
519K
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2142 (0.04%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
3403 (-0.74%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
1635 (2.04%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
763 (1.86%)
TOTAL
7921
7943 (0.28%)

Multithread

347

519K
Test#1 (Integers)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
0 (nan%)
TOTAL
0
0 (nan%)

Performance/W
347
519K
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
0 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
0 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
0 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
0 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
0 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
519K
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
534 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
249 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
2596 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8