| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Pentium 4 HT 515J


Description
Both models 347 and 515J are based on NetBurst architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the 515J gets 0 k points.

Summarizing, the 515J is NAN times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
f41
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Prescott
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/1
1/2
TDP
86 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
8+8 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
1024 kB
Date
September 2006
2004

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
515J
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1522 (-2.59%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
2714 (-10.41%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1321 (-3.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
759 (1.11%)
TOTAL
6710
6316 (-5.86%)

Multithread

347

515J
Test#1 (Integers)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
0 (nan%)
TOTAL
0
0 (nan%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
515J
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2045 (-4.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
3253 (-5.11%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
1564 (-2.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
760 (1.42%)
TOTAL
7921
7622 (-3.77%)

Multithread

347

515J
Test#1 (Integers)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
0 (nan%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
0 (nan%)
TOTAL
0
0 (nan%)

Performance/W
347
515J
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
0 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
0 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
0 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
0 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
0 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
515J
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
697 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
533 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
259 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8