| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Core 2 Duo T7250


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the T7250 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.

Summarizing, the T7250 is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
6fd
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Merom
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
86 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2006
September 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1957 (25.21%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
2000 (-33.98%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1961 (43.51%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
1224 (63.05%)
TOTAL
6710
7142 (6.44%)

Multithread

347

T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
0
3872 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
3950 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3795 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1342 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
12959 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2271 (6.06%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
2071 (-39.59%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
2010 (25.44%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
1222 (63.11%)
TOTAL
7921
7574 (-4.38%)

Multithread

347

T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
0
4513 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
4091 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3901 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1317 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
13822 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
395 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8