| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Core 2 Duo E6300


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E6300 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the E6300 gets 12 k points.

Summarizing, the E6300 is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
6f2
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Conroe
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
1.866 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
86 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2006
July 2006

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1821 (16.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
1828 (-39.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1857 (35.91%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
1243 (65.50%)
TOTAL
6710
6749 (0.58%)

Multithread

347

E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
0
3508 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
3588 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3491 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1287 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
11874 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2092 (-2.28%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
1936 (-43.52%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
1792 (11.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
1053 (40.63%)
TOTAL
7921
6874 (-13.22%)

Multithread

347

E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
0
3649 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
3764 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3607 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1028 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
12049 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
56 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
55 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
185 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
E6300
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1121 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
564 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8