| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Celeron N3150


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the N3150 gets 32.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
406c3
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.06 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
1/1
4/4
TDP
86 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
September 2006
March 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1073 (-31.36%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
1739 (-42.60%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1503 (10.01%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
1460 (94.50%)
TOTAL
6710
5776 (-13.92%)

Multithread

347

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
0
3985 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
6310 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
5050 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
2653 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
17999 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
3904 (82.36%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
2291 (-33.18%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
1579 (-1.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
1465 (95.60%)
TOTAL
7921
9239 (16.64%)

Multithread

347

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
0
14886 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
8727 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
5922 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
2745 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
32280 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
2481 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
1455 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
987 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
458 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
5380 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
4442 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8