| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs E Series E-350


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.

Summarizing, the E-350 is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
500f10
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Zacate
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
86 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
kB
Cache L2
512 kB
2x512 kB
Date
September 2006
January 2011

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
830 (-46.87%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
2381 (-21.42%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1411 (3.27%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
746 (-0.70%)
TOTAL
6710
5368 (-20.00%)

Multithread

347

E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
0
1449 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
3972 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
2184 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
819 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
8424 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
1784 (-16.68%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
2326 (-32.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
1407 (-12.19%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
744 (-0.62%)
TOTAL
7921
6262 (-20.95%)

Multithread

347

E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
0
2835 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
3894 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
2419 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
900 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
10048 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
558 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8