| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the 4200+ is based on K8.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4200+ is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
40fb2
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Brisbane
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket AM2
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
86 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
2x512 kB
Date
September 2006
January 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1130 (-27.69%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
3762 (24.18%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1718 (25.74%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
673 (-10.39%)
TOTAL
6710
7283 (8.55%)

Multithread

347

4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
0
2183 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
7100 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3336 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
699 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
13318 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2877 (34.38%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
3976 (15.98%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
2004 (25.09%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
716 (-4.43%)
TOTAL
7921
9574 (20.87%)

Multithread

347

4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
0
5577 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
7672 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3881 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
704 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
17833 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
86 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
60 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
11 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
274 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1308 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1807 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
911 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
4352 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8