Celeron N3450 vs Pentium N5000
Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.4 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.4 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
706a1
Core
Apollo Lake
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
17.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
54.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
5.12k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
7.66k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.79k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.7k (x0.96)
TOTAL
13.11k
17.27k (x1.32)
Multithread
N3450
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
17.56k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
25.71k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
9.45k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
2.05k (x0.72)
TOTAL
39.33k
54.76k (x1.39)
Performance/W
N3450
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
2927 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
341 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
9127 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3450
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
1895 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
2838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
631 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
6396 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4