| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Pentium Dual-Core T4500


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the T4500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the T4500 gets 23 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.4 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
1067a
Core
Braswell
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2010

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
2105 (96.23%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
5401 (210.56%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
2266 (50.71%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
1220 (-16.47%)
TOTAL
5776
10991 (90.31%)

Multithread

N3150

T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
4205 (5.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
10753 (70.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
4533 (-10.24%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
1343 (-49.38%)
TOTAL
17999
20833 (15.75%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
2630 (-32.63%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
5884 (156.82%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
2364 (49.72%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
1187 (-18.94%)
TOTAL
9239
12065 (30.59%)

Multithread

N3150

T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
5265 (-64.63%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
11691 (33.96%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
4733 (-20.08%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
1345 (-51.00%)
TOTAL
32280
23034 (-28.64%)

Performance/W
N3150
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
150 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
658 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
5246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8