Celeron N3150 vs Xeon E5502
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.4 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.4 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
106a5
Core
Braswell
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
4.76k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
3.15k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
1.94k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.45k (x1.01)
TOTAL
9.21k
11.3k (x1.23)
Multithread
N3150
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
9.48k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
6.3k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.86k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.64k (x1.03)
TOTAL
31.8k
22.28k (x0.7)
Performance/W
N3150
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4