| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Core 2 Duo E4500


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E4500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the E4500 gets 16 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 2 times faster than the E4500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
6fd
Core
Braswell
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2015
July 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
2199 (104.95%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
2205 (26.80%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
2213 (47.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
1198 (-17.97%)
TOTAL
5776
7815 (35.30%)

Multithread

N3150

E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
4396 (10.30%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
4424 (-29.89%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
4448 (-11.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
1196 (-54.93%)
TOTAL
17999
14464 (-19.64%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
2528 (-35.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
2294 (0.13%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
2311 (46.37%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
1196 (-18.36%)
TOTAL
9239
8328 (-9.86%)

Multithread

N3150

E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
4983 (-66.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
4590 (-47.40%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
4628 (-21.84%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
1766 (-35.66%)
TOTAL
32280
15968 (-50.53%)

Performance/W
N3150
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
71 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
246 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
E4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
544 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
3786 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8