Celeron N3150 vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 18 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 18 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
306d4
Core
Braswell
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
68.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
2.67k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
9.37k (x5.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
3.13k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
2.59k (x1.78)
TOTAL
5.78k
17.76k (x3.07)
Multithread
N3150
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
4.16k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
19.01k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
6.48k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
2.96k (x1.12)
TOTAL
18k
32.61k (x1.81)
Performance/W
N3150
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
664 points/W
277 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1052 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
432 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
442 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
3000 points/W
2174 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
516 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
836 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
702 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
TOTAL
2777 points/GHz
6577 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4