Celeron N3150 vs Core i3-6100T
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 18 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 18 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.8 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
506e3
Core
Braswell
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2015
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
105.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.07k
3.14k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
1.74k
12.26k (x7.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.5k
3.94k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.46k
2.21k (x1.51)
TOTAL
5.78k
21.55k (x3.73)
Multithread
N3150
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.99k
6.52k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
6.31k
30.61k (x4.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
10.59k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
2.77k (x1.05)
TOTAL
18k
50.49k (x2.8)
Performance/W
N3150
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
664 points/W
186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1052 points/W
875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
842 points/W
302 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
442 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
3000 points/W
1442 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
516 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
836 points/GHz
3832 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
702 points/GHz
690 points/GHz
TOTAL
2777 points/GHz
6733 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4