| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Core Duo T2450


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the T2450 is based on Mobile.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the T2450 gets 11.4 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 2.8 times faster than the T2450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
6ec
Core
Braswell
Yonah
Architecture
Airmont
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
micro FC-PGA 478-pin
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2015

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
1036 (-3.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
1855 (6.64%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
1756 (16.80%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
971 (-33.52%)
TOTAL
5776
5617 (-2.74%)

Multithread

N3150

T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
1778 (-55.39%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
3515 (-44.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
3053 (-39.54%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
935 (-64.76%)
TOTAL
17999
9281 (-48.44%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
1812 (-53.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
1962 (-14.36%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
1808 (14.52%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
903 (-38.36%)
TOTAL
9239
6485 (-29.81%)

Multithread

N3150

T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
3406 (-77.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
3887 (-55.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
3099 (-47.67%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
975 (-64.50%)
TOTAL
32280
11367 (-64.79%)

Performance/W
N3150
T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
INF points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
INF points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
INF points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
INF points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
INF points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
906 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
981 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
904 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
451 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
3243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8