Celeron N3150 vs N3060
Description
Both models N3150 and N3060 are based on Airmont architecture.
Airmont is a 14nm shrink of Silvermont and it’s intended for low power CPUs such as Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums models. There are two cores: Braswell (for Pcs) and Cherry Trail (for tablets)
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 2.4 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Airmont is a 14nm shrink of Silvermont and it’s intended for low power CPUs such as Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums models. There are two cores: Braswell (for Pcs) and Cherry Trail (for tablets)
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 2.4 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
406c4
Core
Braswell
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
March 2015
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
4.68k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
2.74k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
1.83k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
0.9k (x0.63)
TOTAL
9.21k
10.15k (x1.1)
Multithread
N3150
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
6.31k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
3.68k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
2.46k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
0.91k (x0.35)
TOTAL
31.8k
13.36k (x0.42)
Performance/W
N3150
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4