| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs G1610T


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
306a9
Core
Braswell
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
March 2015
December 2012

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
2343 (118.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
6537 (275.85%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
3002 (99.69%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
2738 (87.51%)
TOTAL
5776
14620 (153.14%)

Multithread

N3150

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
4666 (17.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
12658 (100.59%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
5950 (17.81%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
2526 (-4.82%)
TOTAL
17999
25799 (43.33%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
7873 (101.64%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
7135 (211.43%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
3043 (92.76%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
2786 (90.19%)
TOTAL
9239
20837 (125.53%)

Multithread

N3150

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
15118 (1.56%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
14052 (61.01%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
5938 (0.27%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
3481 (26.81%)
TOTAL
32280
38589 (19.55%)

Performance/W
N3150
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8