| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs E3300


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the E3300 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.3 times faster than the E3300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
1067a
Core
Braswell
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
March 2015
August 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
2290 (113.50%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
5867 (237.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
2487 (65.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
1012 (-30.70%)
TOTAL
5776
11656 (101.82%)

Multithread

N3150

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
4574 (14.78%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
11656 (84.72%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
4893 (-3.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
1037 (-60.92%)
TOTAL
17999
22160 (23.12%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
2898 (-25.76%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
6377 (178.34%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
2585 (63.75%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
1076 (-26.53%)
TOTAL
9239
12937 (40.02%)

Multithread

N3150

E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
5755 (-61.34%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
12670 (45.18%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
5158 (-12.91%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
1014 (-63.06%)
TOTAL
32280
24597 (-23.80%)

Performance/W
N3150
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
378 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8