| | | |

Celeron N3150 vs Celeron D 331


Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the 331 is based on NetBurst.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 32.3 k points while the 331 gets 0 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is INF times faster than the 331. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
406c3
f41
Core
Braswell
Prescott-256
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
LGA775
Cores/Threads
4/4
1/1
TDP
6 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
16 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Date
March 2015
Jun 2005

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3150
331
Test#1 (Integers)
1073
1379 (28.54%)
Test#2 (FP)
1739
2459 (41.40%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1503
1194 (-20.57%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1460
615 (-57.89%)
TOTAL
5776
5647 (-2.22%)

Multithread

N3150

331
Test#1 (Integers)
3985
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
6310
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5050
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2653
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
17999
0 (-100.00%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
331
Test#1 (Integers)
3904
1856 (-52.47%)
Test#2 (FP)
2291
2957 (29.08%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1579
1414 (-10.41%)
Test#1 (Memory)
1465
619 (-57.75%)
TOTAL
9239
6847 (-25.90%)

Multithread

N3150

331
Test#1 (Integers)
14886
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
8727
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5922
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
2745
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
32280
0 (-100.00%)

Performance/W
N3150
331
Test#1 (Integers)
2481 points/W
0 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1455 points/W
0 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
987 points/W
0 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
458 points/W
0 points/W
TOTAL
5380 points/W
0 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3150
331
Test#1 (Integers)
1877 points/GHz
696 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
759 points/GHz
530 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
232 points/GHz
TOTAL
4442 points/GHz
2567 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8