Celeron N3150 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The N3150 is based on Airmont architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.9 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3150 gets a score of 31.8 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.9 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c3
300f10
Core
Braswell
Llano
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.08 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
March 2015
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
9.21k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.8k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3150
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
3.91k
3.98k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
2.29k
4k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.57k
2.05k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.37k (x0.95)
TOTAL
9.21k
11.4k (x1.24)
Multithread
N3150
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
14.78k
5.74k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
8.62k
6.05k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
2.85k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
1.86k (x0.73)
TOTAL
31.8k
16.5k (x0.52)
Performance/W
N3150
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2463 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1437 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
973 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
428 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
5300 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3150
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1880 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1102 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
4429 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4