Celeron N3060 vs Virtual CPU 2,84GHz
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the 2,84GHz is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 6 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 6 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
f4a
Core
Braswell
-
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.84 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.84 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
6 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
January 2016
-
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
21.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
79.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.27k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
8.93k (x3.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.79k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
5.23k (x5.8)
TOTAL
10.15k
21.22k (x2.09)
Multithread
N3060
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
19.35k (x3.07)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
40.57k (x11.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
13.15k (x5.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
6.7k (x7.35)
TOTAL
13.36k
79.76k (x5.97)
Performance/W
N3060
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W