Celeron N3060 vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the Q6700 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 1.5 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 1.5 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
6fb
Core
Braswell
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2016
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
10.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
19.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
3.06k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.74k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.56k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.68k (x1.87)
TOTAL
10.15k
10.05k (x0.99)
Multithread
N3060
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
7.28k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
5.83k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
5.13k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
1.53k (x1.68)
TOTAL
13.36k
19.77k (x1.48)
Performance/W
N3060
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
61 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
54 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
208 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
962 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
632 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4