Celeron N3060 vs Core i3-370M
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the i3-370M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 1.4 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 1.4 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
20655
Core
Braswell
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
0.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
8.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
18.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
3.4k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.35k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.35k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.39k (x1.54)
TOTAL
10.15k
8.49k (x0.84)
Multithread
N3060
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
7.18k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
5.13k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
3.5k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
2.33k (x2.56)
TOTAL
13.36k
18.15k (x1.36)
Performance/W
N3060
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
147 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
518 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
561 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
3537 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4