Celeron N3060 vs N3150
Description
Both models N3060 and N3150 are based on Airmont architecture.
Airmont is a 14nm shrink of Silvermont and it’s intended for low power CPUs such as Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums models. There are two cores: Braswell (for Pcs) and Cherry Trail (for tablets)
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 2.4 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Airmont is a 14nm shrink of Silvermont and it’s intended for low power CPUs such as Atoms, Celerons and Pentiums models. There are two cores: Braswell (for Pcs) and Cherry Trail (for tablets)
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 2.4 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
406c3
Core
Braswell
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
31.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
3.91k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.29k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
1.57k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.44k (x1.6)
TOTAL
10.15k
9.21k (x0.91)
Multithread
N3060
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
14.78k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
8.62k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
5.84k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
2.57k (x2.82)
TOTAL
13.36k
31.8k (x2.38)
Performance/W
N3060
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
5300 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4