Celeron N3060 vs A6 3600
Description
The N3060 is based on Airmont architecture while the 3600 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3060 gets a score of 13.4 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.3 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406c4
300f10
Core
Braswell
Llano
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.48 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x64+4x64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x1024 kB
Date
January 2016
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
10.15k points
12.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.36k points
44.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3060
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
4.03k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
4.25k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.83k
2.19k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.9k
1.54k (x1.71)
TOTAL
10.15k
12.01k (x1.18)
Multithread
N3060
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6.31k
15.66k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
3.68k
16.66k (x4.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.46k
8.33k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.91k
3.48k (x3.81)
TOTAL
13.36k
44.12k (x3.3)
Performance/W
N3060
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1051 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
614 points/W
256 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
410 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
2227 points/W
679 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3060
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1885 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1104 points/GHz
1770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
739 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
364 points/GHz
642 points/GHz
TOTAL
4092 points/GHz
5006 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4