Celeron N2840 vs Core Duo T2450
Description
The N2840 is based on Silvermont architecture while the T2450 is based on Mobile.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N2840 gets a score of 16.8 k points while the T2450 gets 11.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.5 times faster than the T2450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N2840 gets a score of 16.8 k points while the T2450 gets 11.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.5 times faster than the T2450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30678
6ec
Core
Bay Trail-M
Yonah
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.58 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1170
micro FC-PGA 478-pin
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
7,5 W
W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
10.36k points
6.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
16.79k points
11.37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N2840
T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
4.8k
1.81k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
2.47k
1.96k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.81k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
0.9k (x0.74)
TOTAL
10.36k
6.49k (x0.63)
Multithread
N2840
T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
8.24k
3.41k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
4.19k
3.89k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.05k
3.1k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
0.97k (x0.74)
TOTAL
16.79k
11.37k (x0.68)
Performance/W
N2840
T2450
Test#1 (Integers)
1177 points/W