Celeron J3455 vs Pentium N3540
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the N3540 gets 37.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.3 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the N3540 gets 37.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.3 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
30678
Core
Apollo Lake
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2016
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
10.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
37.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
4.97k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
2.58k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1.98k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
1.2k (x0.82)
TOTAL
12.98k
10.72k (x0.83)
Multithread
J3455
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
18.92k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
9.67k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
7.37k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.54k (x0.74)
TOTAL
47.34k
37.5k (x0.79)
Performance/W
J3455
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
2703 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
1382 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
1053 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
5357 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
1864 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
448 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
4020 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4