Celeron J3455 vs Core i7-930
Description
The J3455 is based on Goldmont architecture while the i7-930 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i7-930 gets 69.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-930 is 1.5 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J3455 gets a score of 47.3 k points while the i7-930 gets 69.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-930 is 1.5 times faster than the J3455. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
106a5
Core
Apollo Lake
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
February 2010
Mean monothread perf.
12.98k points
17.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.34k points
69.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J3455
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
6.02k
7.28k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
3.49k
4.82k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.86k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.47k
2.62k (x1.79)
TOTAL
12.98k
17.58k (x1.35)
Multithread
J3455
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
23.7k
28.09k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
13.75k
21.62k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.8k
14.83k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
4.85k (x2.32)
TOTAL
47.34k
69.39k (x1.47)
Performance/W
J3455
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
2370 points/W
216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1375 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
780 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
4734 points/W
534 points/W
Performance/GHz
J3455
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
2619 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1517 points/GHz
1571 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
872 points/GHz
933 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
637 points/GHz
855 points/GHz
TOTAL
5645 points/GHz
5732 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4