Celeron J1900 vs Virtual CPU 2,84GHz
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the 2,84GHz is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 2.4 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the 2,84GHz gets 79.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2,84GHz is 2.4 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
f4a
Core
Bay Trail-D
-
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.84 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.84 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
10 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
- kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
November 2013
-
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
21.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
79.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
4.27k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
8.93k (x3.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
2.79k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
5.23k (x4.61)
TOTAL
9.75k
21.22k (x2.18)
Multithread
J1900
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
19.35k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
40.57k (x4.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
13.15k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
6.7k (x4.64)
TOTAL
33.25k
79.76k (x2.4)
Performance/W
J1900
2,84GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W