Celeron J1900 vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the Q6700 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.7 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.7 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
6fb
Core
Bay Trail-D
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2013
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
10.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
19.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
3.06k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
2.74k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
2.56k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.68k (x1.48)
TOTAL
9.75k
10.05k (x1.03)
Multithread
J1900
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
7.28k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
5.83k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
5.13k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.53k (x1.06)
TOTAL
33.25k
19.77k (x0.59)
Performance/W
J1900
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
61 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
54 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
208 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
962 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
632 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4