Celeron J1900 vs Core 2 Duo T6400
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the T6400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the T6400 gets 17.1 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.9 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the T6400 gets 17.1 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.9 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
1067a
Core
Bay Trail-D
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
FC-PGA
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
November 2013
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
10.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
17.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J1900
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1.24k
1.76k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
1.77k
4.63k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.65k
1.86k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.15k
1k (x0.87)
TOTAL
5.81k
9.24k (x1.59)
Multithread
J1900
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.68k
3.21k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
8.75k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.15k
3.47k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.14k (x0.79)
TOTAL
18.96k
16.58k (x0.87)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
2.26k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
4.98k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.89k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
0.96k (x0.84)
TOTAL
9.75k
10.08k (x1.03)
Multithread
J1900
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
4.06k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
8.53k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.38k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.11k (x0.77)
TOTAL
33.25k
17.08k (x0.51)
Performance/W
J1900
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
116 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
488 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
T6400
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
2491 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
478 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
5040 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4