Celeron J1900 vs N4120
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.4 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4120 is 1.4 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
706a8
Core
Bay Trail-D
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2013
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
5.94k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
7.51k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
2.78k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
2.67k (x2.35)
TOTAL
9.75k
18.9k (x1.94)
Multithread
J1900
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
15.02k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
19.77k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
7.71k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
3.67k (x2.54)
TOTAL
33.25k
46.17k (x1.39)
Performance/W
J1900
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4