Celeron J1900 vs N3060
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.5 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.5 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
406c4
Core
Bay Trail-D
Braswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
November 2013
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
4.68k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
2.74k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.83k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
0.9k (x0.79)
TOTAL
9.75k
10.15k (x1.04)
Multithread
J1900
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
6.31k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
3.68k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
2.46k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
0.91k (x0.63)
TOTAL
33.25k
13.36k (x0.4)
Performance/W
J1900
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4