Celeron J1900 vs N2840
Description
Both models J1900 and N2840 are based on Silvermont architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2 times faster than the N2840. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
30678
Core
Bay Trail-D
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
November 2013
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
4.8k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
2.47k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
1.86k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.22k (x1.07)
TOTAL
9.75k
10.36k (x1.06)
Multithread
J1900
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
8.24k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
4.19k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.05k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.32k (x0.91)
TOTAL
33.25k
16.79k (x0.51)
Performance/W
J1900
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4