Celeron J1900 vs A6 3600
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the 3600 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.3 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the 3600 gets 44.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.3 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
300f10
Core
Bay Trail-D
Llano
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x64+4x64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x1024 kB
Date
November 2013
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
12.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
44.12k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
4.03k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
4.25k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
2.19k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.54k (x1.36)
TOTAL
9.75k
12.01k (x1.23)
Multithread
J1900
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
15.66k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
16.66k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
8.33k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
3.48k (x2.41)
TOTAL
33.25k
44.12k (x1.33)
Performance/W
J1900
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
256 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
128 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
679 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1770 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
913 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
642 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
5006 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4