Celeron J1900 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The J1900 is based on Silvermont architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J1900 gets a score of 33.2 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 2 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
30679
300f10
Core
Bay Trail-D
Llano
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.42 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1170
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2013
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
9.75k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.25k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J1900
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
4.58k
3.98k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
2.32k
4k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.72k
2.05k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.37k (x1.2)
TOTAL
9.75k
11.4k (x1.17)
Multithread
J1900
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
17.16k
5.74k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
8.42k
6.05k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
2.85k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.86k (x1.29)
TOTAL
33.25k
16.5k (x0.5)
Performance/W
J1900
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1716 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
842 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
622 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
3325 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
J1900
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
1893 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
709 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
470 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
4029 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4