Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 4.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 4.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
50657
Core
Skylake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
11264 kB
Date
December 2015
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
311.57k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.59k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
9.5k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
3.15k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
5.9k (x1.76)
TOTAL
18.59k
21.13k (x1.14)
Multithread
G3900TE
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
21.09k (x4.74)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
80.93k (x4.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
30.76k (x5.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
8.51k (x2.43)
TOTAL
31.59k
141.3k (x4.47)
Performance/W
G3900TE
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
127 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
519 points/W
952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
903 points/W
1662 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4259 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
8084 points/GHz
6604 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4