Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon X5675
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 2.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
206c2
Core
Skylake-S
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2015
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
8.77k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
5.82k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
3.47k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
2.98k (x0.89)
TOTAL
27.33k
21.04k (x0.77)
Multithread
G3900TE
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
53.23k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
39.35k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
27.05k (x4.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
5.28k (x1.49)
TOTAL
49.34k
124.92k (x2.53)
Performance/W
G3900TE
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4