| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 76.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-S
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2015
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
3.45k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
9.96k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.26k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
4.27k (x1.27)
TOTAL
18.59k
21.94k (x1.18)

Multithread

G3900TE

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
14.01k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
37.68k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
17.05k (x3.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
7.35k (x2.1)
TOTAL
31.59k
76.09k (x2.41)

Performance/W
G3900TE
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
127 points/W
175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
519 points/W
471 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
903 points/W
951 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4259 points/GHz
2845 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
TOTAL
8084 points/GHz
6268 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4