| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i7-5820K


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 3.7 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306f2
Core
Skylake-S
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
35 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
15360 kB
Date
December 2015
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
129.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
3.82k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
9.64k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.29k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.78k (x1.13)
TOTAL
18.59k
21.53k (x1.16)

Multithread

G3900TE

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
18.07k (x4.06)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
64.25k (x3.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
27.03k (x4.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
8.03k (x2.29)
TOTAL
31.59k
117.38k (x3.72)

Performance/W
G3900TE
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
127 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
519 points/W
459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
903 points/W
838 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
1062 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4259 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
TOTAL
8084 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4