| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 3 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
806ec
Core
Skylake-S
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2015
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
143.23k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
3.68k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
16.08k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
4.99k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
7.95k (x2.37)
TOTAL
18.59k
32.69k (x1.76)

Multithread

G3900TE

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
14.29k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
61.15k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
16.53k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
3.72k (x1.06)
TOTAL
31.59k
95.69k (x3.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
13.6k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
20.03k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
5.19k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
7.05k (x2.11)
TOTAL
27.33k
45.87k (x1.68)

Multithread

G3900TE

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
51.42k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
77.48k (x3.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
16.65k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.69k (x1.04)
TOTAL
49.34k
149.24k (x3.02)

Performance/W
G3900TE
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
3428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
5165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
1110 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
5135 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1332 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1808 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
11762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4