Celeron G3900TE vs Core i5-5200U
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-5200U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 31.6 k points while the i5-5200U gets 32.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-5200U is 1 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306d4
Core
Skylake-S
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2015
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
31.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
68.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.67k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
9.37k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
3.13k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
2.59k (x0.77)
TOTAL
18.59k
17.76k (x0.96)
Multithread
G3900TE
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
4.16k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
19.01k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
6.48k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
2.96k (x0.85)
TOTAL
31.59k
32.61k (x1.03)
Performance/W
G3900TE
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
127 points/W
277 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
519 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
156 points/W
432 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
197 points/W
TOTAL
903 points/W
2174 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i5-5200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1028 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4259 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1337 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1461 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
TOTAL
8084 points/GHz
6577 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4