Celeron G3900TE vs Core i3-3110M
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-S
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2015
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
33.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
6.66k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
6.88k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
2.68k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
2.6k (x0.78)
TOTAL
27.33k
18.83k (x0.69)
Multithread
G3900TE
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
16.56k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
11.7k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
7.28k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
2.25k (x0.63)
TOTAL
49.34k
37.78k (x0.77)
Performance/W
G3900TE
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
1080 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4