Celeron G3900TE vs N5100
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.8 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5100 is 1.8 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
906c0
Core
Skylake-S
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2015
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
9.74k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
9.84k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
3.89k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3.51k (x1.05)
TOTAL
27.33k
26.98k (x0.99)
Multithread
G3900TE
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
34.19k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
36.28k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
15.3k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
4.05k (x1.14)
TOTAL
49.34k
89.82k (x1.82)
Performance/W
G3900TE
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4