Celeron G3900TE vs N4100
Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
706a1
Core
Skylake-S
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
kB
Date
December 2015
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
4.72k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
6.99k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
2.69k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
2.81k (x0.84)
TOTAL
27.33k
17.21k (x0.63)
Multithread
G3900TE
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
12.54k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
17.99k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
6.71k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.33k (x0.94)
TOTAL
49.34k
40.57k (x0.82)
Performance/W
G3900TE
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
G3900TE
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4