Celeron G1610T vs Xeon X5670
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the X5670 is 3 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206c2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2012
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
8.35k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
5.58k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
3.32k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
3k (x1.08)
TOTAL
20.84k
20.26k (x0.97)
Multithread
G1610T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
49.72k (x3.29)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
35.19k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
21.88k (x3.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
8.6k (x2.47)
TOTAL
38.59k
115.4k (x2.99)
Performance/W
G1610T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4